Home Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 219


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 60-63

Impact of cataract surgery on visual functions and quality of life in Azare, North-Eastern Nigeria


1 Department of Ophthalmology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Nigerian Airforce Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
3 Department of Vitreoretina, National Eye Centre, Kaduna, Nigeria
4 Naval Medical Centre, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication7-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mohammed Dantani Adamu
Department of Ophthalmology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/sjopthal.sjopthal_13_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of cataract surgery on the subjective visual functions (VFs) and quality of life (QoL) of patients who had cataract surgery at the Federal Medical Centre Azare, Bauchi State, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective observational study which used the VF and QoL questionnaires. These were administered to the patients preoperatively and also 6 weeks' postoperatively. The visual acuity, VF, and QoL scores of the pre- and post-operative period were compared. A paired t-test was used for comparison. Results: A total of 181 patients were recruited. The mean age of the patients was 60.5 years, and 110 (60.8%) were males. The mean preoperative VF and QoL scores were 55.1 (Standard deviation [SD] ± 19.7) and 39.5 (SD ± 17.8), respectively. The mean postoperative VF and QOL scores were 31.5 (SD ± 9.9, t = 18.79, P = <0.001) and 25.4 (SD ± 2.4, t = 10.87, P ≤ 0.001) respectively. Conclusion: This study shows that both VFs and QoL of cataract patients can be greatly improved with cataract surgery.

Keywords: Cataract, quality of life, visual function


How to cite this article:
Adamu MD, Saidu A, Babanini MA, Mohammed AS. Impact of cataract surgery on visual functions and quality of life in Azare, North-Eastern Nigeria. Sudanese J Ophthalmol 2018;10:60-3

How to cite this URL:
Adamu MD, Saidu A, Babanini MA, Mohammed AS. Impact of cataract surgery on visual functions and quality of life in Azare, North-Eastern Nigeria. Sudanese J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 20];10:60-3. Available from: http://www.sjopthal.net/text.asp?2018/10/2/60/253677




  Introduction Top


Globally, cataract is known to be the leading cause of blindness and low vision accounting for 48% of the causes of blindness.[1] In Africa,[2] it accounts for 50%–55% of blindness while in Nigeria, the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of 2007 reported that 43% of blindness was due to cataract.[3] Cataract was also reported to be the most common cause of severe visual impairment.[4],[5],[6]

Conventionally, the gains from cataract surgery have only been demonstrated clinically by change in Snellen visual acuity (VA) in the operated eye.[7] Most often, the functional outcome of cataract surgery as it relates to everyday life with respect to vision-dependent activities or quality of life (QoL) is not assessed separately. This is due to the assumption that improved VA would automatically translate to improved QoL.[7] However, it is possible that the measurement of other aspects of visual function (VF) after cataract surgery might be a better outcome measure than VA alone. It is against this background that the World Health Organization recommended that assessment of VF and vision-related QoL be given more attention in people with visual impairment.[8]

Most studies assessing VFs and QoL were conducted in developed countries with very few in developing countries like Nigeria and none actually conducted in Azare, North Eastern Nigeria to the best of the author's knowledge. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of cataract surgery on the VFs and QoL from patients' perspectives.


  Materials and Methods Top


This study was a hospital-based, prospective observational study conducted at Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Azare. All cataract patients aged 40 years or older who presented to the eye unit of FMC Azare from October 5, 2015–February 26, 2016, with presenting VA of <6/60 to The perception of light in either eye were consecutively recruited for the study. All patients had small incision cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation performed by two Ophthalmic Surgeons.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of the FMC, Azare. The procedure involved and the implications for participating in this study were explained to the participants and informed consent obtained from willing participants. Patients with ocular and systemic comorbidities and those who could not consent for the study were excluded. A total of 168 patients met the inclusion criteria and were recruited into the study.

Study tools

Visual functions/quality of life questionnaires

A VFs/QoL questionnaire that was developed, validated, and initially used in India for a clinical trial on cataract surgery was used in this study.[9] It is an interviewer-administered questionnaire that has been used in other developing countries including Nigeria.[10] For standardization, the questionnaire was translated into the local Hausa dialect and then back-translated to English language with the help of a trained linguist. The questionnaire was then tested on 18 cataract patients awaiting cataract surgery in Azare General Hospital, which is also situated in the same town as the FMC Azare. Patients recruited for the pilot study were not included in the final analysis of the data collected in this study.

Visual functions questionnaire

The VF questionnaire measures an individual's visual capabilities using five subscales:

  1. General vision: This is assessed by a single question (question 1)
  2. Visual perception: This is assessed by four questions (questions 2–5), which measure limitation in everyday activities, near vision, intermediate vision, and distant vision
  3. Peripheral vision: This is assessed by a single question (question 6)
  4. Sensory adaptation: This is assessed by six questions (questions 7a and 7b, 8, 9,11a and 11b), measuring light/dark adaptation, visual search, color discrimination, and glare disability
  5. Depth perception: This is assessed by a single-question subscale.


Quality of life questionnaire

The QoL questionnaire assessed the difficulties individuals face in everyday life because of visual loss under the following subscales:

  1. Self-care (bathing, eating, dressing, and toileting)
  2. Mobility (walking to the home of neighbors, walking to shops, and doing household chores)
  3. Social functions (attending social function and meeting with friends)
  4. Mental feelings (feeling of being a burden to others, dejection, and loss of confidence).


Scoring of visual function and quality of life questionnaire

In this study, the style of scoring of the questionnaires as used by Monsudi et al. was adopted.[10] The scoring was done on the basis of best judgment, and a simple scoring scheme was used. For each response, the 4-point rating scale was scored from 1 (no problem) to 4 (maximum problem), with 2 and 3 being the intermediate ranking. The total cumulative score was first calculated for each subscale and expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score. The scores across all the subscales are then added together to obtain the overall VF and QoL scores. The higher the value of the score, the poorer the VF/QoL. Conversely, the lower the value of the score, the better the QoL/VF as the case may be. Decreasing scores from baseline, therefore, meant improvement in VF or QoL.

Data collection

The principal investigator administered the questionnaires to the patients preoperatively and also 6 weeks' postoperatively during follow-up. All patients had comprehensive ocular examination pre- and post-operatively including refraction at 6 weeks' postoperative visit.

Data analysis

All data were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, SSPS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) statistical package and expressed as mean and/or Standard Error of Mean. Snellen's VA values were converted to LogMAR VA for ease of calculation. VA of counting fingers, hand motion, and light perception has no precise Snellen's equivalent but has to be assumed and worked out. We, therefore, assigned values of 2.3, 2.6, and 2.9, respectively, to them. This was based on a similar validated scoring in a previous study in southern India.[9] Pre- and post-operative findings were compared using Student's t-test. The correlation coefficient was used to determine the association between the VA, VF, and QoL score preoperatively and 6 weeks' postoperatively.


  Results Top


A total of 201 patients were enrolled in the study. However, at 6 weeks' follow-up postoperatively, only 181 patients were assessed, giving an attrition rate of 9.9%, with 20 patients lost to follow-up.

Majority of the patients (60.8%) were males with a male: female ratio of 1:0.6; majority (45.3%) were farmers and greater than half of them (58.6%) had no formal education. [Table 1] shows the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients

Click here to view


Visual functions before and after cataract surgery

A total of 362 eyes of 181 patients were studied. The mean overall preoperative VF score was 55.12 ± 19.96 which improved to 31.49 ± 9.88 after cataract surgery. This difference was statistically significant as shown by paired t-test (t = 18.79, df = 180, P < 0.001). This is shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Preoperative and 6 weeks' postoperative mean visual functions score

Click here to view


Furthermore, a positive correlation (r = 0.745) was found between postoperative VA in the better eye and change in VF scores of patients 6 weeks after cataract surgery. This observed positive correlation was statistically significant at P < 0.001.

Quality of life before and after cataract surgery

The results showed that the mean overall preoperative QoL score was 39.5 ± 17.8 which improved to 25.44 ± 2.39 after cataract surgery. This difference was statistically significant as shown by paired t-test (t = 18.79, df = 180, P < 0.001). The results of other subscales of QoL including self-care, mobility, social activities, and mental feelings are shown in [Table 3].
Table 3: Preoperative and 6 weeks' postoperative mean quality of life score

Click here to view


There was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.812) between postoperative VA in the better eye and change in QoL scores of patients 6 weeks after cataract surgery (P < 0.001).


  Discussion Top


This hospital-based, prospective, observational study was conducted in the North-Eastern part of Nigeria to assess the impact of cataract surgery on the VFs and QoL from patients' perspectives.

There were more males than females in this study. This could be due to the fact that males are more economically empowered than females in the study area and hence could have more access to healthcare.[11] Furthermore, other cultural and religious norms in the study area often demand that women must obtain permission before attending hospital. This disparity is also similar to findings of other studies in Nigeria.[12],[13],[14] The age range of patients in this study (40–86 years) is similar to findings of other studies in Nigeria.[13],[15] Majority of the patients in this study were farmers. This is due to the fact that Bauchi State is mainly an agrarian society.

Preoperatively, there was decreased overall VF with a reduction in all the subscales. This has been reported by Nigeria's National Blindness and Low Vision Survey group.[16] There was improvement in the overall VF following cataract surgery – all the subscales improved. The most affected subscale was “general vision” subscale while the least affected was “depth perception.” This was similar to findings in Nigeria[13],[14] and Nepal.[17] A possible explanation for the observed improvement in the VF may be the fact that patients with coexisting ocular morbidity were excluded. This possibility was also stated by Mozaffarieh et al.[18]

In general, the findings of this study showed an overall improvement of QoL postoperatively compared to the one preoperatively. This finding compares favorably with the findings of similar studies by Desai et al.,[7] Olawoye et al.[13] and Finger et al.,[19] all of which reported significant gains in VF and QoL in cataract patients postoperatively. One possible explanation for this improved QoL may be the sociocultural characteristics of the populace to please the interviewer, and not sound offensive by offering negative responses. Another possibility is that being mainly farmers, a slight improvement in their VAs may be adequate for their activities of daily living.

On the individual subscales, “self-care” was reportedly the worst affected by the visual impairment preoperatively, while the least affected was the “mental feelings” subscale. This is possibly so due to the peculiarity of the culture of the people where this research was carried out. The sociocultural and religious norms in that environment which mandate the children to provide care for their parents could have accounted for the less affectation of the patients' mental feelings subscale by visual impairment. This is in contrast to the findings of a similar study in Nepal by Pokharel et al.,[17] in which the “mobility” subscale was the worst affected by visual impairment followed by the “mental feelings” subscale. Our study also demonstrated that the “self-care” subscale recorded the most gain postoperatively among all the other subscales. This is very important because it was the subscale that the patients seem to be more concerned about since they would be able to take care of their basic need without any assistance.


  Conclusion Top


One major limitation of this study is the attrition rate of almost 10%; however, this is usually the norm with prospective studies. The study recommends performance of regular cataract surgical audit and incorporation of the VFs and QoL pro forma in such audits.

This study has shown that cataract surgery can greatly enhance the overall VF and QoL of cataract patients living in a rural community.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Dandona L, Dandona R. What is the global burden of visual impairment? BMC Med 2006;4:6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:844-51.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Abdull MM, Sivasubramaniam S, Murthy GV, Gilbert C, Abubakar T, Ezelum C, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Nigeria: The nigeria national blindness and visual impairment survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:4114-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Babalola OE. The peculiar challenges of blindness prevention in Nigeria: A review article. Afr J Med Med Sci 2011;40:309-19.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Nwosu SN. Blindness and visual impairment in Anambra state, Nigeria. Trop Geogr Med 1994;46:346-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Fafowora OF. Prevalence of blindness in a rural ophthalmically underserved Nigerian community. West Afr J Med 1996;15:228-31.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Desai P, Reidy A, Minassian DC, Vafidis G, Bolger J. Gains from cataract surgery: Visual function and quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:868-73.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
World Health Organization. Consultation on development of standards for characterization of vision loss and visual functioning. Bull World Health Organ 2003;1:4-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fletcher AE, Ellwein LB, Selvaraj S, Vijaykumar V, Rahmathullah R, Thulasiraj RD, et al. Measurements of vision function and quality of life in patients with cataracts in Southern India. Report of instrument development. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:767-74.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Monsudi KF, Mahmoud A, Ibrahim A. Impact of cataract surgery on visual function and quality of life in Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria. Br J Med Health Sci 2012;1:80-99.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Acha KC. Trend and levels of women empowerment in Nigeria. J Appl Math Stat 2014;2:402-40.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Oladigbolu KK, Rafindadi AL, Mahmud-Ajeigbe AF, Chinda D, Pam V, Samaila E, et al. Outcome of cataract surgery in rural areas of Kaduna state, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2014;13:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Olawoye O, Ashaye A, Bekibele C, Ajuwon AJ. Quality-of-life and visual function after manual small incision cataract surgery in South Western Nigeria. West Afr J Med 2012;31:114-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Babalola OE, Odugbo OP, Morgan R. Impact of cataract surgery on quality of life in Plateau State, Nigeria. Niger J Ophthalmol 2009;17:5-10.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Obiudu HC, Obi BI, Anyalebechi OC. Monitoring cataract surgical outcome in a public hospital in Orlu, South East Nigeria. Niger Med J 2009;50:77-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
  [Full text]  
16.
Tran HM, Mahdi AM, Sivasubramaniam S, Gudlavalleti MV, Gilbert CE, Shah SP, et al. Quality of life and visual function in Nigeria: Findings from the national survey of blindness and visual impairment. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1646-51.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Pokharel GP, Selvaraj S, Ellwein LB. Visual functioning and quality of life outcomes among cataract operated and unoperated blind populations in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:606-10.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Mozaffarieh M, Krepler K, Heinzl H, Sacu S, Wedrich A. Visual function, quality of life and patient satisfaction after ophthalmic surgery: A comparative study. Ophthalmologica 2004;218:26-30.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Finger RP, Kupitz DG, Fenwick E, Balasubramaniam B, Ramani RV, Holz FG, et al. The impact of successful cataract surgery on quality of life, household income and social status in South India. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e44268.  Back to cited text no. 19
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed424    
    Printed60    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded68    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]